Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,069 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Trade And World Market results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 925 hits . Analysis detected 7,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,910 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,070 of 37,536 keywords). This International Trade And World Market is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. International Trade And World Market
Keyword details
Total words: 10,910
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst