Keyword summary
9% 1 analyzed article/video 526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Mathematical Union results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 109 hits . Analysis detected 778 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,578 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,241 of 37,536 keywords). This International Mathematical Union is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group. International Mathematical Union
Keyword details
Total words: 1,578
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst