Keyword summary
76%2 analyzed articles/videos252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interceptors results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 1,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,246 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 55% (23,451 of 51,227 keywords). This Interceptors is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Interceptors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
55%Interceptors (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,246
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510054.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.5%4.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos