Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Inspiration results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 1,475 hits . Analysis detected 5,890 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,447 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Inspiration is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Inspiration
Keyword details
Total words: 5,447
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 27.1% 27.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst