Keyword summary
17%2 analyzed articles/videos1,969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ingredients results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 482 hits. Analysis detected 4,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,552 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,052 of 37,313 keywords). This Ingredients is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Ingredients
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
25%Ingredients (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,552
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

25% percentile
025507510024.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate