Keyword summary
94%1 analyzed article/video1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indra Nooyi results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 896 hits. Analysis detected 5,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,969 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,424 of 35,444 keywords). This Indra Nooyi is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Indra Nooyi
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
74%Indra Nooyi (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,969
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.0%18.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 22.6%22.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos