Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Independent Candidates results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 336 hits . Analysis detected 2,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,432 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,675 keywords). This Independent Candidates is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Independent Candidates
Keyword details
Total words: 6,432
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst