Keyword summary
47%7 analyzed articles/videos6,866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Income Tax Cuts results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 3,073 hits. Analysis detected 19,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,974 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (29,925 of 35,718 keywords). This Income Tax Cuts is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Income Tax Cuts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
17%Income Tax Cuts (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510016.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles25K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate