Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Libby Howell results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 252 hits. Analysis detected 1,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 801 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This Libby Howell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Libby Howell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Libby Howell (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 801
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles801 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 31.5%31.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 28.1%28.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 11.2%11.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.4%10.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 9.9%9.9%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 31.3%31.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Author 31.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Author 31.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 28.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos