Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Libby Howell results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and False Dilemma , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 252 hits . Analysis detected 1,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 801 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This Libby Howell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Libby Howell
Author details
Total words: 801
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles801 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 31.5% 31.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 28.1% 28.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 11.2% 11.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 9.9% 9.9% Blind-Spot Bias Sitewide 0.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 31.3% 31.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Indoctrination: Author 31.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect: Author 31.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 28.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% False Dilemma: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 2.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst