Keyword summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos4,269 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ilhan Omar results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 3,484 hits. Analysis detected 26,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,076 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,128 of 37,536 keywords). This Ilhan Omar is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Ilhan Omar
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
57%Ilhan Omar (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate