Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabel Vincent results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 2,173 hits . Analysis detected 10,319 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,288 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (1,974 of 6,315 authors). This Isabel Vincent is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Isabel Vincent
Author details
Total words: 7,288
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 29.8% 29.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.3% 14.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.8% 7.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 29.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst