Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,808 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iceman results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 720 hits. Analysis detected 5,295 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,331 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,497 of 37,536 keywords). This Iceman is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Iceman
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
38%Iceman (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,331
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510037.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate