Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Icebreakers results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 612 hits. Analysis detected 4,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,602 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,832 keywords). This Icebreakers is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Icebreakers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Icebreakers (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,602
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos