Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hyperscale Data results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 476 hits . Analysis detected 2,874 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,602 of 37,536 keywords). This Hyperscale Data is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Hyperscale Data
Keyword details
Total words: 2,232
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.7% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst