Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hybrids results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 625 hits . Analysis detected 4,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,608 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,361 of 37,536 keywords). This Hybrids is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group. Hybrids
Keyword details
Total words: 2,608
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.1% percentile 5.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.8% 23.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 24.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst