Keyword summary
49%4 analyzed articles/videos395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hybrid results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 738 hits. Analysis detected 7,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,413 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,082 of 37,105 keywords). This Hybrid is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Hybrid
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
30%Hybrid (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,413
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510029.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate