Keyword summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hudson River Park Trust results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 339 hits . Analysis detected 1,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 78% (12,248 of 54,550 keywords). This Hudson River Park Trust is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group. Hudson River Park Trust
Keyword details
Total words: 1,592
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.5% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 21.3% 21.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst