Keyword summary
34% 2 analyzed articles/videos 704 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hudson River results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 273 hits . Analysis detected 1,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,563 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,015 of 37,533 keywords). This Hudson River is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Hudson River
Keyword details
Total words: 2,563
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst