Keyword summary
40% 3 analyzed articles/videos 667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houstonians results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 635 hits . Analysis detected 5,809 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,742 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (20,941 of 35,668 keywords). This Houstonians is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Houstonians
Keyword details
Total words: 6,742
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst