Keyword summary
3% 7 analyzed articles/videos 570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Matters results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 180 hits . Analysis detected 1,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,252 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,115 of 37,374 keywords). This Houston Matters is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Houston Matters
Keyword details
Total words: 3,252
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Middle Ground: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst