Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Brenda Valdivia results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 101 faulty-reasoning hits from 434 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Brenda Valdivia is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Brenda Valdivia
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Brenda Valdivia (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 434
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles434 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.9%6.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos