Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Judiciary Committee results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 1,371 hits . Analysis detected 7,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,440 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,291 of 34,791 keywords). This House Judiciary Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group. House Judiciary Committee
Keyword details
Total words: 4,440
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.9% percentile 5.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 30.9% 30.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.9%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 0.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst