Keyword summary
90% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,793 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hong Kong results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 2,214 hits . Analysis detected 13,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,345 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (20,830 of 35,444 keywords). This Hong Kong is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group. Hong Kong
Keyword details
Total words: 11,345
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst