Keyword summary
93% 2 analyzed articles/videos 849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hodeida results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 1,331 hits . Analysis detected 7,164 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,570 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 74% (10,010 of 37,536 keywords). This Hodeida is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group. Hodeida
Keyword details
Total words: 4,570
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.3% percentile 4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 29.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 9.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 0.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst