Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helms Burton Act results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 457 hits . Analysis detected 3,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,312 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (25,067 of 37,536 keywords). This Helms Burton Act is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Helms Burton Act
Keyword details
Total words: 5,312
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst