Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helms Burton Act results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 457 hits. Analysis detected 3,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,312 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (25,067 of 37,536 keywords). This Helms Burton Act is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Helms Burton Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
34%Helms Burton Act (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,312
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510033.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate