Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 929 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hegseth Pete results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 881 hits . Analysis detected 5,522 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,716 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (6,881 of 35,444 keywords). This Hegseth Pete is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Hegseth Pete
Keyword details
Total words: 3,716
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.6% percentile 5.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.7% 23.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.4% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst