Keyword summary
55%6 analyzed articles/videos1,584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Tech results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,588 hits. Analysis detected 11,164 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,485 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (16,690 of 34,673 keywords). This Health Tech is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Health Tech
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
52%Health Tech (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 4.2%4.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate