Keyword summary
36%5 analyzed articles/videos260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Has Vertical results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 613 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,040 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 89% (6,922 of 58,814 keywords). This Has Vertical is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510088.2% percentile
5.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate