Keyword summary
78%3 analyzed articles/videos2,130 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harry Reid results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,000 hits. Analysis detected 10,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,422 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (16,110 of 34,043 keywords). This Harry Reid is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Harry Reid
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Bastille Day1%
0%Radio Broadcasts1%
0%Metropolitan Opera1%
0%Borders1%
0%French Revolution1%
53%Harry Reid (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,422
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510052.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.1%4.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate