Keyword summary
13% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harris County Da results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,289 hits . Analysis detected 7,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,770 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,627 of 37,536 keywords). This Harris County Da is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. Harris County Da
Keyword details
Total words: 13,770
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst