Keyword summary
85% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Halo Campaign Evolved results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 2,663 hits . Analysis detected 10,091 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,382 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,173 of 37,536 keywords). This Halo Campaign Evolved is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group. Halo Campaign Evolved
Keyword details
Total words: 9,382
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 28.4% 28.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 28.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst