Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video348 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grooming results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 50.4% saturation with 702 hits. Analysis detected 3,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,326 of 37,536 keywords). This Grooming is worse (more manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group.
Grooming
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
92%Grooming (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,392
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510091.1% percentile
7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 36.5%36.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 31.1%31.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 50.4%50.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 50.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 36.5%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 31.1%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos