BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 63.8% saturation with 222 hits. Analysis detected 1,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 348 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 74.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (3,893 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the article peer group.

California legislators are acting quickly to protect the state from voters. 
One of the surprises in California’s primary elections this year was the success of Sonja Shaw, a Southern California school board member who has led an effort to secure parental notification policies in a state that wants to protect secret sexual discussions between groomer teachers and children. 
With Shaw as its president, the Chino Valley School Board adopted a policy requiring school officials to notify parents when students declare a new gender identity on campus. 
That local policy effort led to bruising litigation that ended with a tenuous victory for parents. 
Though ongoing appellate litigation purportedly places school districts in a “legal limbo,” the state can’t currently prevent districts from adopting parental notification policies. 
This year, Shaw ran for a statewide role as California’s superintendent of public education. 
In a deep blue state that doesn’t elect Republicans to statewide office, Shaw was the top vote-getter in the primary, with close to a quarter of the vote against a crowded field. 
A pro-parent conservative has a real shot at becoming the state’s top public school official. 
So here’s a Friday headline from an education news website: “State superintendent will no longer manage California schools under deal Newsom cuts with Legislature.” 
The conservative activist Lance Christensen, a vice president at the California Policy Center, sounded the alarm about a “gut-and-amend” bill that had no text until late last week but is suddenly set to race to the governor’s desk for a signature. 
You can read the full text of AB 181 here. 
The likely-to-succeed bill proposes to transfer authority for public schools to an “education commissioner” appointed by the governor, turning the role of the superintendent of public schools into a functionally empty advocacy role: “the independently elected nonpartisan voice for the public interest in the governance of the state’s educational system.” 
The job would be to give speeches and attend rallies. 
Shaw's reaction: 
New blue state tactic: When conservatives threaten to win public office, make the office meaningless. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 25.3%Chris Bray: 6.7%The Federalist: 8.5%Confirmation Bias25.3%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 1.7%The Federalist: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.8%Chris Bray: 3.1%The Federalist: 3.5%Availability Heuristic11.8%This article: 9.2%Chris Bray: 1.2%The Federalist: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic9.2%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.8%The Federalist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 14.4%Chris Bray: 1.1%The Federalist: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias14.4%This article: 63.8%Chris Bray: 13.9%The Federalist: 10.1%Framing Effect63.8%This article: 4.6%Chris Bray: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.4%Loss Aversion4.6%This article: 8.0%Chris Bray: 0.7%The Federalist: 0.6%Status Quo Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Chris Bray: 1.4%The Federalist: 1.0%Optimism Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 2.3%The Federalist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 31.3%Chris Bray: 19.0%The Federalist: 12.4%Negativity Bias31.3%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.7%The Federalist: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Chris Bray: 1.4%The Federalist: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error3.2%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%Chris Bray: 2.7%The Federalist: 3.9%In-Group Bias13.5%This article: 13.5%Chris Bray: 1.2%The Federalist: 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias13.5%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.6%The Federalist: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 1.6%The Federalist: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.2%Chris Bray: 1.2%The Federalist: 1.3%Recency Bias9.2%This article: 2.9%Chris Bray: 0.6%The Federalist: 0.6%Primacy Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 6.9%The Federalist: 5.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 4.3%The Federalist: 2.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.9%Chris Bray: 2.8%The Federalist: 5.0%Appeal to Authority6.9%This article: 14.4%Chris Bray: 3.2%The Federalist: 2.8%False Dilemma14.4%This article: 19.0%Chris Bray: 1.8%The Federalist: 2.3%Slippery Slope19.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.2%Chris Bray: 12.7%The Federalist: 11.4%Hasty Generalization9.2%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.3%Chris Bray: 0.6%The Federalist: 0.5%Bandwagon4.3%This article: 25.3%Chris Bray: 9.2%The Federalist: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion25.3%This article: 3.2%Chris Bray: 1.1%The Federalist: 3.1%Begging the Question3.2%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 1.6%The Federalist: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.0%The Federalist: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.5%Chris Bray: 3.5%The Federalist: 2.8%Anecdotal7.5%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 16.4%Chris Bray: 3.3%The Federalist: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)16.4%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 14.4%Chris Bray: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.2%Special Pleading14.4%This article: 0.0%Chris Bray: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.8%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 41.4%Chris Bray: 5.6%The Federalist: 3.1%Unattributed Quote41.4%This article: 6.9%Chris Bray: 3.9%The Federalist: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection6.9%This article: 50.6%Chris Bray: 30.3%The Federalist: 19.7%Biased Writer Voice50.6%This article: 4.3%Chris Bray: 2.7%The Federalist: 5.2%Indoctrination4.3%This article: 3.2%Chris Bray: 0.7%The Federalist: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.2%This article: 32.5%Chris Bray: 12.9%The Federalist: 15.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias32.5%This article: 2.9%Chris Bray: 0.4%The Federalist: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.9%

348 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers16%attributed speech292writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageLance Christensen • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageSonja Shaw • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lance Christensen

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words73% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +75.3 ptsWriter: 24.7%Lance Christensen: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-60.3 ptsWriter: 60.3%Lance Christensen: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-49.3 ptsWriter: 49.3%Lance Christensen: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%Lance Christensen: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-3.8 ptsWriter: 3.8%Lance Christensen: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.4 ptsWriter: 3.4%Lance Christensen: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.