Keyword summary
93%2 analyzed articles/videos792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greenhouse Gas results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 864 hits. Analysis detected 6,558 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,406 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,339 of 37,536 keywords). This Greenhouse Gas is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Greenhouse Gas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
60%Greenhouse Gas (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,406
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 16.0%16.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos