Keyword summary
20% 1 analyzed article/video 739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greater Cleveland results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anecdotal , and Anchoring Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 193 hits . Analysis detected 1,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (36,924 of 52,379 keywords). This Greater Cleveland is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Greater Cleveland
Keyword details
Total words: 2,956
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst