Keyword summary
99% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great Power results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 1,935 hits . Analysis detected 16,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,455 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,263 of 34,692 keywords). This Great Power is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. Great Power
Keyword details
Total words: 8,455
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.4% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.8% 18.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 21.4% 21.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst