Keyword summary
99%2 analyzed articles/videos1,751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great Power results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 1,935 hits. Analysis detected 16,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,455 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,263 of 34,692 keywords). This Great Power is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Great Power
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
71%Great Power (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,455
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.8%18.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 21.4%21.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos