Keyword summary
60% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,676 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great Lakes results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,900 hits . Analysis detected 14,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,729 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (30,430 of 36,707 keywords). This Great Lakes is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Great Lakes
Keyword details
Total words: 17,729
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles17.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst