Keyword summary
71%1 analyzed article/video684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grand Staircase National Monument results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 581 hits. Analysis detected 2,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (12,850 of 34,746 keywords). This Grand Staircase National Monument is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Grand Staircase National Monument
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
63%Grand Staircase National Monument (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 21.2%21.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.2%11.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos