Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,430 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grand Central results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 550 hits. Analysis detected 4,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,920 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (33,361 of 35,718 keywords). This Grand Central is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Grand Central
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
7%Grand Central (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.6% percentile
1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate