Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Governor Spencer Cox results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 657 hits. Analysis detected 3,132 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,160 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,565 of 37,536 keywords). This Governor Spencer Cox is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Governor Spencer Cox
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
51%Governor Spencer Cox (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,160
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510050.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate