Keyword summary
12% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Ethics results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 514 hits . Analysis detected 3,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,507 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,133 of 37,536 keywords). This Government Ethics is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Government Ethics
Keyword details
Total words: 6,507
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst