Keyword summary
20% 1 analyzed article/video 820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Good Luck Charm results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 227 hits . Analysis detected 1,615 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (21,357 of 36,204 keywords). This Good Luck Charm is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group. Good Luck Charm
Keyword details
Total words: 2,460
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst