Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Goldman Sachs Group Inc results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and False Dilemma , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 429 hits . Analysis detected 2,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (8,536 of 37,536 keywords). This Goldman Sachs Group Inc is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group. Goldman Sachs Group Inc
Keyword details
Total words: 1,940
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.3% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 22.1% 22.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst