Keyword summary
4% 10 analyzed articles/videos 8,398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gold Mountain Fire results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 2,162 hits . Analysis detected 13,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,943 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (37,242 of 37,536 keywords). This Gold Mountain Fire is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Gold Mountain Fire
Keyword details
Total words: 40,943
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 0.9% BS Score10 analyzed articles40.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst