Keyword summary
18% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgetown results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 206 hits . Analysis detected 1,937 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,860 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (34,037 of 37,536 keywords). This Georgetown is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Georgetown
Keyword details
Total words: 4,860
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst