Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gender Affirmation results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.1% saturation with 548 hits. Analysis detected 3,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,713 of 37,536 keywords). This Gender Affirmation is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Gender Affirmation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠93%Gender Affirmation (selected)9%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,516
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510092.8% percentile
8.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 36.1%36.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 28.0%28.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 21.4%21.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 22.6%22.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 36.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 31.1%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 28.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 15.9%Straw Man: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos