Keyword summary
28%2 analyzed articles/videos854 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Garfield County results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Slippery Slope, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 807 hits. Analysis detected 4,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,750 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,275 of 36,902 keywords). This Garfield County is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Garfield County
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
32%Garfield County (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,750
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510031.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate