Keyword summary
52%1 analyzed article/video761 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Funeral Costs results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 1,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,283 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,673 of 37,536 keywords). This Funeral Costs is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Funeral Costs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
51%Funeral Costs (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,283
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos