Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,015 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frontier Airlines results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 1,445 hits . Analysis detected 6,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,060 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,226 of 36,117 keywords). This Frontier Airlines is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group. Frontier Airlines
Keyword details
Total words: 4,060
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.8% percentile 5.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 27.1% 27.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 35.6% 35.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 35.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst