Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Frank Gehry results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 3,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,216 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,533 keywords). This Frank Gehry is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Frank Gehry
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Frank Gehry (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,216
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos